Please note: This review reflects information we gathered on the date it was researched and may now be out of date. Providers frequently change their pricing, plans, medications, and policies. Any ratings, reviews, and customer feedback are gathered from publicly available online sources and may have since changed or no longer be accurate. Always do your own research and confirm the latest details directly with the provider before making any decision.
Nutricost Review
The supplements with the best evidence are cheap commodities sold without a story. This is where you buy them.
Nutricost
Where The Boring Stuff Is CheapThe whole evidence-based stack, priced: creatine monohydrate 500g unflavoured at $23.97 against a stated 5g serving — about 24 cents a day, $87 a year; pea protein $38.97 for 4lb, roughly $9.74 a pound or 67 cents per 25g of protein; soluble fibre $20.97. Under $450 a year for everything with real evidence behind it.
For scale, against what we have just reviewed: a stem-cell supplement at $2,268 a year, sermorelin at ~$2,148, NAD+ at ~$1,932, a C15:0 product at $487. The entire proven stack costs less than the C15:0 supplement alone. The cheap things are cheap because nobody can build a story around creatine.
But decode two badges first. "Manufactured in an NSF Certified, GMP Compliant, FDA Registered Facility" describes the building, not the bottle. NSF Certified for Sport — which tests individual products for banned substances and label accuracy — is the stronger claim and is not what is offered. And FDA registration is a mandatory legal status with no inspection or approval attached, despite appearing 158 times where it reads as a quality mark.
Two more things to know. They claim per-batch testing "by third party ISO accredited laboratories" — a specific and creditable claim — but across 250 products we found only five references to a certificate and no published results, so you are trusting rather than reading. And Proposition 65 lead warnings appear on several items including the creatine: that is a legal disclosure against a very conservative Californian threshold rather than a finding of harm, and it is common on plant-derived supplements — but it is a reason to want those certificates published.
Affiliate disclosure: GLP1Drugs.org earns 2% of order value — the lowest rate in this batch, about 48 cents on a $23.97 creatine tub. We make more from almost anything else we review, and this is the one we would actually buy. Verified 11 August 2026.
Visit NutricostOur Top Recommended Provider: CoreAge Rx
After reviewing dozens of GLP-1 telehealth providers, CoreAge Rx is the one we recommend most. CoreAge Rx is one of our partners — read on for why we recommend them:
Flat-Rate Pricing
Same cost at every dose level — no price jumps as you titrate up.
Verified Pharmacies
US-licensed physicians and NABP-verified 503A compounding pharmacies you can trust.
Everything Included
Medication, supplies, free shipping, and ongoing clinical support — no hidden fees.
Active Community of Members
Ask questions, share progress, and get answers from other patients on the same journey — alongside ongoing clinical support from your care team.
$0.24
Per Day For Creatine
$9.74
Per Pound Of Pea Protein
~$430
The Whole Proven Stack, Yearly
0
Certificates Of Analysis Published
What We Verified
Prices, serving sizes and claim wording quoted from their own published data for 250 products. All per-gram and per-serving figures are our arithmetic, shown so you can check them.
Creatine At About 24 Cents A Day
Creatine Monohydrate Powder, unflavoured, 500g at $23.97 with a stated 5g serving — that is 100 servings at roughly $0.24 each, or about $87 a year. Creatine monohydrate is among the best-evidenced supplements in existence for supporting resistance training, which is the intervention that actually protects lean mass
Pea Protein At Roughly 67 Cents Per 25g Of Protein
Pea Protein Powder, 4lb at $38.97, works out near $0.022 a gram of powder — about $9.74 a pound. At roughly 80% protein that is around 67 cents for a 25g protein serving, which is genuinely cheap and matters when appetite has collapsed
But Their Whey Is Not Actually The Bargain
Whey Protein Concentrate runs $120.97 for 5lbs, about $24 a pound, and Whey Protein Isolate $137.97 for 5lbs. Those are ordinary prices rather than value prices. If cost is the reason you came, the pea protein at $9.74 a pound is less than half as much per gram
"NSF Certified Facility" Is Not NSF Certified Product
The phrase across their range is "Manufactured in an NSF Certified, GMP Compliant, FDA Registered Facility". That describes the site, not the contents. NSF Certified for Sport, which tests individual products for banned substances and label accuracy, is a different and much stronger certification, and it is not what is claimed here
"FDA Registered Facility" Signifies Almost Nothing
Every facility manufacturing food or supplements for the US market is required to register with the FDA. It is an administrative obligation, not an endorsement, an inspection result or any form of approval — and it appears 158 times across their catalogue where it reads to most people as a quality mark
Third-Party Testing Is Claimed But Not Published
Some listings state that "Each batch... undergoes testing by third party ISO accredited laboratories", which is a specific and creditable claim. Across 250 products we found only 5 references to a certificate or COA and located no published results, so you are trusting the claim rather than reading the data
The Entire List Worth Buying
Three supplements with real evidence for substantial weight loss, plus one conditional. Everything else in a 250-product catalogue is optional.
| What | Why | Price Here |
|---|---|---|
| Creatine monohydrate, 5g/day | Among the best-evidenced supplements there is; makes resistance training more productive | $23.97 / 500g — ~$87/yr |
| Protein, to reach your daily target | The central nutritional problem on these medicines. Pea is complete, unlike collagen | $38.97 / 4lb — ~67c per 25g |
| Fibre, with fluid | Constipation is among the commonest complaints, and fibre plus fluid is first-line | $20.97 soluble or acacia |
| Magnesium, if constipation persists | Oxide and citrate forms have a genuine osmotic effect. Ask a clinician first | From $11.97 |
| Everything else | Optional. A large catalogue is not a shopping list | |
One thing to expect with creatine: it draws water into muscle, so scale weight typically rises slightly in the first week or two. On a medication where you watch the scale closely that can be alarming — it is not fat, and it is not the drug failing. If you have any kidney concern, ask your clinician before starting. Our side-effects guide covers constipation and lean-mass loss in more detail.
Decoding The Badges
These phrases appear on most supplements, not just these. Worth knowing permanently.
| The Phrase | What It Actually Means |
|---|---|
| NSF Certified Facility | The site was assessed against NSF standards. Real, but about the building |
| NSF Certified for Sport | The stronger claim: individual products tested for banned substances and label accuracy. Not offered here |
| FDA Registered Facility | A mandatory legal registration. No inspection, no approval, no endorsement whatsoever |
| GMP Compliant | Follows Good Manufacturing Practices. Meaningful, and largely a baseline expectation |
| Third-party tested | Only as good as the published certificate. Ask to see one; here we found none |
For what the top of that ladder looks like in practice, see our Cerebelly review, where results are searchable by the batch code on the packet — the standard we would like every brand held to.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓Creatine monohydrate at roughly $0.24 per 5g serving, or about $87 a year for daily use
- ✓Pea protein at about $9.74 a pound, less than half the per-gram cost of their whey
- ✓A stated 5g creatine serving with a scoop included, so dosing is unambiguous
- ✓Per-batch third-party testing by ISO accredited laboratories claimed on at least some products
- ✓GMP compliance claimed across essentially the whole range
- ✓An $8.99 whey protein sample pack lets you test flavours before buying a 5lb tub
- ✓Soluble fibre at $20.97 and acacia fibre from $20.97, which is cheap for the GLP-1 complaint it addresses
- ✓Magnesium glycinate at $24.97 for 360 capsules, and several magnesium forms to choose between
- ✓A very large catalogue at commodity prices, so you rarely need to shop elsewhere
- ✓Unflavoured options exist across the range, which avoids paying for sweeteners you do not want
Cons
- ✕"NSF Certified Facility" reads like product certification and is not — NSF Certified for Sport is the stronger claim and is absent
- ✕"FDA Registered Facility" is a mandatory administrative status, not an endorsement, and appears 158 times
- ✕Third-party testing is claimed but we found no published certificates across 250 products
- ✕California Proposition 65 lead warnings appear on multiple products including the creatine monohydrate
- ✕Whey concentrate at about $24 a pound and isolate at higher is not a value price
- ✕The 1kg creatine tub offers almost no saving per gram over the 500g, so bulk buying gains little
- ✕Flavoured creatine is priced inconsistently against unflavoured across sizes
- ✕A 250-product catalogue includes a great deal we would not recommend buying at all
- ✕Commission is 2%, the lowest rate in this batch, at about 48 cents on a 500g creatine tub
Our Verdict
4.0 / 5 — the right place to buy the boring things that work, once you decode two badges.
This review is deliberately a counterpoint to most of what we have published recently. In the past few weeks we have assessed a supplement range sold on circulating stem cell counts at $189 a bottle, roughly $2,268 a year and up to about $10,380 for an accelerated protocol; sermorelin and NAD+ programmes at $179 and $161 a month, annualising near $2,148 and $1,932; and a C15:0 product at $119.95 for ninety days, around $487 a year, marketed as correcting a deficiency in a nutrient that no authority classifies as essential. The common thread was that in each case the thing genuinely proven was that a number inside the body moved, with the leap to a health benefit made by the marketing rather than the evidence. So it is worth stating plainly what the alternative looks like. For someone losing a substantial amount of weight on a GLP-1, the supplements with real evidence behind them are creatine monohydrate, enough protein, and fibre. That is the list. It is short, unglamorous, and cheap.
Nutricost prices all three at commodity rates. Creatine monohydrate, unflavoured, is $23.97 for 500g against a stated 5g serving with a scoop included — a hundred servings, about 24 cents a day, roughly $87 a year. Their Pea Protein Powder is $38.97 for 4lb, which is about $9.74 a pound or near $0.022 a gram, working out around 67 cents for a 25g protein serving. Soluble fibre is $20.97 and organic acacia fibre starts at $20.97. Magnesium, a reasonable fourth if constipation proves stubborn since oxide and citrate forms have a genuine osmotic effect, starts at $11.97. Add it up and the whole evidence-based stack runs something under $450 a year — less than the C15:0 supplement costs on its own, and about a fifth of the cheapest longevity protocol we have reviewed. The reason for that gap is not quality. It is that nobody can build a compelling story around creatine monohydrate, so it competes on price, while products whose benefit is a narrative compete on the narrative and price accordingly.
Before buying, two phrases need decoding, and they appear across most of the supplement industry rather than only here. The wording throughout this catalogue is "Manufactured in an NSF Certified, GMP Compliant, FDA Registered Facility", with one listing elaborating that a product is made in "a facility that follows rigorous quality control measures, meeting NSF certification standards". Every part of that describes the building, not the bottle. NSF certification of a facility means the site was assessed against NSF standards, which is genuinely better than nothing. It is not NSF Certified for Sport, the per-product certification that tests individual batches for banned substances and label accuracy, and which is what cautious buyers and athletes actually look for. The two are routinely conflated, usually without deceptive intent, and the conflation always favours the seller. "FDA Registered Facility" deserves harsher treatment: registration is simply a legal requirement for anyone making food or supplements for the US market, involving no inspection, no approval and no endorsement. It appears 158 times across this catalogue, where it reads to most people as a quality mark and means almost nothing. Every brand we have criticised most severely is also made in an FDA-registered facility.
Three things hold the rating at four rather than higher. First, testing is claimed but not shown. Some listings state that "Each batch... undergoes testing by third party ISO accredited laboratories", which is a specific and creditable claim — but across 250 products we found only five references to a certificate and no published results anywhere. Claimed testing sits in the middle of the disclosure ladder: better than nothing, well short of the brand we reviewed recently whose heavy metal results are searchable by the batch code on the packet. Second, Proposition 65 lead warnings appear on several products including the creatine monohydrate: "Consuming this product can expose you to chemicals including lead..." That deserves context rather than alarm — California's thresholds are far lower than federal ones, plant-derived products commonly trigger them because plants take up lead from soil, and the law requires a warning rather than reformulation. But it is precisely why published certificates would matter, and anyone pregnant or trying to conceive should raise it with a clinician. Third, their whey is not actually cheap: concentrate at about $24 a pound and isolate higher are ordinary prices, so if cost is your reason for coming, buy the pea protein, which is complete — unlike collagen, which lacks tryptophan entirely — and less than half as much per gram.
A few practical notes. Their $8.99 whey sample pack is a sensible way to avoid committing to a 5lb tub of a flavour you dislike. The 1kg creatine tub at $46.97 offers almost no saving per gram over the 500g at $23.97, so there is little reason to buy the larger one. Unflavoured options exist throughout, which means not paying for sweeteners you do not want. Expect creatine to raise scale weight slightly in the first week or two, because it draws water into muscle — on a medication where you are watching the scale, knowing that in advance prevents an unnecessary scare, and it is neither fat nor a sign the drug has stopped working. And if you have kidney disease or any renal concern, creatine is the one item here that warrants a proper conversation with your clinician rather than a shrug. Finally, a 250-product catalogue is not a shopping list; the three or four items above are what we would buy and the rest is optional at best. Our disclosure: 2% commission, the lowest rate of any merchant in this batch, which comes to roughly 48 cents on a creatine tub — we earn more from almost everything else we have reviewed, and this is the one we would actually spend our own money on.
Visit NutricostFrequently Asked Questions
What is actually worth buying here?
Three things, and they are the only supplements we would argue have real evidence behind them for this audience. First, creatine monohydrate. It is one of the most studied supplements in existence, its effect on strength and training capacity is well replicated, and since resistance training is the intervention that actually protects lean mass during weight loss, anything that supports training is doing useful work. Nutricost sells it unflavoured at 500g for $23.97 with a stated 5g serving, which is roughly 24 cents a day or about $87 a year. Second, protein. Getting an adequate intake into a collapsed appetite is the central nutritional problem of GLP-1 treatment, and their Pea Protein Powder at $38.97 for 4lb works out around $9.74 a pound — roughly 67 cents for a 25g protein serving. Third, fibre. Constipation is among the most commonly reported effects of these medicines, fibre plus fluid is first-line, and their Soluble Fiber at $20.97 and Organic Acacia Fiber from $20.97 are inexpensive. Magnesium is a reasonable fourth if constipation is stubborn, since magnesium oxide and citrate have a genuine osmotic effect, and they sell several forms from $11.97. That is the list. It comes to something under $450 a year for all of it, and everything else in a 250-product catalogue is optional at best.
How does that compare to what else you have reviewed?
It is the whole point of this review, and the comparison is stark. Over recent weeks we have looked at a supplement range built on circulating stem cell counts costing $189 a bottle, roughly $2,268 a year, rising to about $10,380 for an accelerated protocol. We have looked at sermorelin and NAD+ programmes at $179 and $161 a month, around $2,148 and $1,932 annually. We have looked at a C15:0 supplement at $119.95 for ninety days, about $487 a year, sold as correcting a deficiency in a nutrient no authority classifies as essential. In each case the proven claim turned out to be that a number in your blood moves, with the health benefit supplied by the marketing rather than the evidence. Now set the entire evidence-based stack against that: creatine at about $87 a year, pea protein at about $245 for a serving a day, fibre at roughly $100. Call it $430 for everything with real support behind it — less than the C15:0 supplement alone, and a fifth of the cheapest longevity protocol. We are not claiming creatine and protein are exciting. They are extremely boring, which is rather the point: the supplements with the best evidence are cheap commodities sold without a story, while the expensive ones are expensive precisely because the story is the product. If you take one thing from this site, let it be that ordering.
What does "NSF Certified Facility" actually mean?
Less than it sounds, and this is the most useful decode on the page. The phrase appearing across their catalogue is "Manufactured in an NSF Certified, GMP Compliant, FDA Registered Facility", with one listing elaborating that a product is "manufactured and packaged in a facility that follows rigorous quality control measures, meeting NSF certification standards". Read carefully: every one of those describes the building, not the bottle. NSF certification of a facility means the manufacturing site has been assessed against NSF standards for its processes and conditions. That is genuinely worth something — it is better than an unassessed facility. What it is not is NSF Certified for Sport, which is a per-product certification in which individual batches are tested for banned substances and for label accuracy, and which is what athletes and cautious buyers actually look for. A facility certification tells you the factory is run properly; a product certification tells you what is in the tub. They are frequently conflated in supplement marketing, usually without any intent to deceive, and the conflation reliably benefits the seller. The related phrase deserves the same treatment: "FDA Registered Facility" appears 158 times across their range, and registration with the FDA is simply a legal requirement for any facility making food or supplements for the US market. It involves no inspection result, no approval and no endorsement. Almost every supplement you can buy is made in an FDA-registered facility, including the ones we have criticised most severely.
Should the Proposition 65 warnings worry me?
Not much, and you should understand them rather than either ignoring or panicking about them. Several Nutricost listings carry the wording: "WARNING: Consuming this product can expose you to chemicals including lead, which is known to the State of California to cause birth defects or other reproductive harm." We found it on turmeric, on ground red pepper, on bone broth protein and — worth knowing — on the creatine monohydrate. Here is the honest context. California's Proposition 65 sets exposure thresholds dramatically lower than federal limits, low enough that a great many ordinary foods exceed them, and the law requires a warning rather than a reformulation. Plant-derived products are especially likely to trigger it because plants take up lead from soil; this is the same soil phenomenon we discussed at length reviewing baby food. So a Prop 65 warning is a legal disclosure that a product may contain a listed substance above a very conservative threshold. It is not a finding that the product is dangerous, and its absence from a competitor's label may simply mean that competitor does not ship to California or has taken a different legal view. That said, two things follow. If you are pregnant or trying to conceive, discuss any supplement carrying a lead warning with your clinician, because that is precisely the population the warning names. And the warning is a good reminder of the gap identified above: the company claims per-batch third-party testing but publishes no certificates, so you cannot see the actual lead numbers. A brand that published them would deserve more trust, and some we have reviewed do.
Is their protein good value?
The pea protein is; the whey is not, and the difference is large enough to matter. Their Pea Protein Powder is $38.97 for 4lb, which is about $9.74 a pound or roughly $0.022 per gram of powder. Their Whey Protein Concentrate is $120.97 for 5lb, about $24 a pound, and the Whey Protein Isolate is $137.97 for 5lb. Those whey prices are unremarkable — they are what you would pay in most places — so if you came here specifically because Nutricost has a reputation for cheapness, the whey is not where you will find it, and the pea protein is less than half the cost per gram. There is a genuine trade-off to weigh rather than simply buying the cheaper one. Whey is a complete protein with a particularly favourable amino acid profile and high leucine content, and it is the most studied protein for supporting muscle protein synthesis. Pea protein is also a complete protein — it contains all nine essential amino acids, unlike collagen, which lacks tryptophan entirely — but it is somewhat lower in methionine and generally considered slightly less potent gram for gram. For most people the practical answer is that either works if total daily protein is adequate, and adequacy is the thing that matters far more than which powder you chose. If dairy disagrees with you, which it does for many people on these medicines, pea is the obvious pick. And for tasting before committing, their $8.99 whey sample pack is a sensible way to avoid a 5lb tub of a flavour you dislike.
Why does creatine matter on a GLP-1?
Because it supports the one intervention that reliably protects what you are at risk of losing. Rapid weight loss takes lean tissue as well as fat — in the published body-composition analysis of semaglutide, fat mass fell around 19.3% and lean body mass around 9.7% over 68 weeks — and the mitigation with the best evidence is progressive resistance training plus adequate protein. Creatine does not replace either, and nothing sold in a tub does. What it does is make the training more productive: creatine monohydrate improves capacity for short, high-intensity work, which means more quality volume in a session, which over months means more of the stimulus that preserves muscle. It is also among the most extensively studied supplements available, with a long safety record in healthy adults at ordinary doses. Two practical notes. Five grams a day, taken consistently, is the standard maintenance dose and is what Nutricost's serving size reflects; loading phases are optional and not necessary. And creatine draws water into muscle cells, so it typically produces a small, prompt increase in scale weight in the first week or two. On a medication where you are watching the scale closely, that can be alarming and is worth expecting — it is not fat, and it is not the drug failing. If you have kidney disease or any renal concern, ask your clinician first, since that is the one context where creatine warrants a proper conversation rather than a shrug.
What are the limits of this review?
We read their catalogue rather than their laboratory, and the distinction matters. Everything quoted here — prices, serving sizes, the NSF and GMP and FDA wording, the Prop 65 warnings, the third-party testing claims — comes from their own published product data for 250 products, read on the date below. We did not purchase, receive or test anything, we commissioned no analysis, and crucially we found no published certificates of analysis: across the whole catalogue there were only five references to a certificate or COA and no results we could read. So the per-batch ISO-accredited testing they describe is a claim we are reporting, not a document we verified. We also did not confirm the NSF facility certification with NSF, or the FDA registration with the FDA, and we have not assessed label accuracy for any product — which for supplements is the question that most often turns out to matter, since independent testing of the wider industry has historically found products that do not contain what their labels state. Nor did we evaluate taste, mixability or digestibility. What we are confident about is the arithmetic: the per-gram and per-serving figures in this review are our own calculations from their stated prices and pack sizes, shown so you can check them. And we are confident about the decodes, because those are matters of what the phrases mean rather than of what any test found.
What is your verdict?
4.0 out of 5 — the right place to buy the boring things that work, once you decode two badges. This review exists as a counterpoint. Recently we have assessed a $189 bottle of supplements sold on circulating stem cell counts, sermorelin at $179 a month, NAD+ at $161, and a C15:0 product at $487 a year marketed as correcting a deficiency in a nutrient no authority classifies as essential — each of them proving that a number in the body moves and leaving the marketing to supply the benefit. Against that, here is the entire list of supplements with genuine evidence for someone losing substantial weight on a GLP-1: creatine monohydrate, adequate protein, and fibre. Nutricost sells creatine unflavoured at 500g for $23.97 against a stated 5g serving, which is about 24 cents a day or $87 a year; pea protein at $38.97 for 4lb, roughly $9.74 a pound and about 67 cents per 25g of protein; and soluble or acacia fibre from $20.97. That is under $450 a year for everything, less than the C15:0 supplement costs on its own. The supplements with the best evidence are cheap commodities sold without a story, and the expensive ones are expensive because the story is the product. Two decodes before you buy. "Manufactured in an NSF Certified, GMP Compliant, FDA Registered Facility" describes the building, not the bottle — NSF Certified for Sport, which tests individual products for banned substances and label accuracy, is the stronger claim and is not what is offered. And FDA registration is a mandatory administrative status carrying no inspection result or approval, despite appearing 158 times where it reads as a quality mark. Three deductions: third-party per-batch testing is claimed but no certificates are published anywhere across 250 products; Proposition 65 lead warnings appear on several items including the creatine, which is common and worth understanding rather than fearing; and their whey at about $24 a pound is simply not a value price, so buy the pea protein if cost is the point. Our disclosure: 2% commission, the lowest in this batch, which is about 48 cents on a creatine tub.
Creatine, Protein, Fibre. That Is The List.
Under $450 a year for everything with real evidence behind it — less than one unproven supplement we reviewed last week. Buy the pea protein rather than the whey, and remember that NSF Certified Facility describes the building.
Visit NutricostCompare Other GLP-1 Providers
See how other telehealth providers stack up.
Mochi Health
Obesity Medicine SpecialistsBoard-certified obesity medicine specialists with both brand-name and compounded GLP-1 options
Read Review →BeyondMD
Top RatedBoard-certified physician-led care with comprehensive medical oversight
Read Review →Form Health
Comprehensive ProgramMultidisciplinary obesity medicine program with physicians, dietitians, and behavioral coaching
Read Review →GoodRx Care
Trusted BrandTelehealth platform from GoodRx with transparent pricing and established trust
Read Review →Henry Meds
Top RatedWell-established telehealth platform with fast physician reviews and competitive pricing
Read Review →LifeMD
Top RatedPublicly traded telehealth company with comprehensive health platform and competitive pricing
Read Review →Medical Disclaimer: This page is informational and is neither medical nor nutritional advice. These are dietary supplements; they are not FDA-approved, have not been evaluated by the FDA for the claims made, and are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. Creatine has a long safety record in healthy adults at ordinary doses but should be discussed with a clinician by anyone with kidney disease, reduced kidney function, or taking medicines affecting the kidneys; it commonly causes a small increase in body water and therefore scale weight. Protein requirements vary by individual and are affected by kidney and liver function; people with chronic kidney disease may be advised to limit rather than increase protein, and targets should be set with a clinician or registered dietitian. Fibre supplements should be introduced gradually and with adequate fluid, and can affect the absorption of some medications — separate them from prescribed medicines and ask a pharmacist about timing. Magnesium can cause diarrhoea, interacts with several medicines including some antibiotics, and requires caution in reduced kidney function. Proposition 65 warnings are legal disclosures made against California exposure thresholds that are substantially lower than federal limits; their presence is not a finding that a product is unsafe, but anyone pregnant, breastfeeding or trying to conceive should discuss supplements carrying a lead warning with their clinician. Statements about NSF facility certification, NSF Certified for Sport, GMP and FDA facility registration describe what those designations mean generally and are offered as consumer context. Tell every clinician treating you about all supplements you take, particularly alongside a GLP-1 receptor agonist. Consult a licensed clinician before starting or changing any treatment.
Date reviewed: 11 August 2026. Prices, pack sizes, serving sizes and claim wording were read from the store's public structured product data for 250 products on that date. Prices cited: Creatine Monohydrate Powder at $18.97 for 300g unflavoured, $23.97 for 500g unflavoured, $46.97 for 1 KG unflavoured, and $16.97 to $26.97 for flavoured variants, with the listing stating 'High Quality Micronized Creatine Monohydrate', '500 Grams/ I KG of Creatine Monohydrate Per Bottle' and '5 Grams Per Serving (Scoop Included)'; Pea Protein Powder at $27.97 for 2lb and $38.97 for 4lb; Whey Protein Concentrate Powder at $51.97 for 1.5lbs up to $120.97 for 5lbs; Whey Protein Isolate Powder at $65.97 for 2lbs up to $137.97 for 5lbs; Clear Whey Protein Isolate at $38.97; Hydrolyzed Whey Protein at $54.97; Organic Whey Protein at $36.97 to $60.97; Organic Egg White Protein at $38.97 to $65.97; Pea Protein, Beef Protein Isolate at $40.97; a Whey Protein Sample Pack at $8.99; Soluble Fiber at $20.97; Organic Acacia Fiber Powder at $20.97 to $29.97; Magnesium Glycinate 210MG at $11.97 for 90 capsules up to $24.97 for 360; Magnesium Oxide Capsules at $12.97 to $16.97; and Magnesium Glycinate Powder at $21.97. All per-gram, per-serving and annual figures in this review are our own arithmetic from those published prices and stated pack sizes and servings — including approximately $0.24 per 5g creatine serving and about $87 a year at one serving daily, about $9.74 per pound and roughly 67 cents per 25g protein serving for the 4lb pea protein assuming approximately 80% protein content, and an approximate total under $450 a year for creatine, protein and fibre together. Actual protein content per serving depends on the specific product label, which we did not read. Claim wording quoted verbatim from their listings: 'Manufactured in an NSF Certified, GMP Compliant, FDA Registered Facility'; 'manufactured and packaged in a facility that follows rigorous quality control measures, meeting NSF certification standards and adhering to Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP)'; 'Independent third-party testing: Each batch of turmeric powder undergoes testing by third party ISO accredited laboratories, ensuring its purity, quality, and safety'; 'Third-Party Tested: Independently verified for quality and safety'; and the California Proposition 65 wording 'WARNING: Consuming this product can expose you to chemicals including lead, which is known to the State of California to cause birth defects or other reproductive harm. For more information, go to www.P65Warnings.ca.gov/food', which we observed on listings including turmeric powder, ground red pepper, chicken bone broth protein and Creatine Monohydrate Powder. Keyword counts across all 250 listings are ours: 'GMP' 247 occurrences, 'gluten-free' 187, 'NSF' 180, 'FDA' 158, third-party 74, 'tested' 63, non-GMO 53, and only 5 references to a certificate or COA. Comparison figures for other brands are taken from our own separate reviews of those products, based on their published prices read within the preceding days. The statement that semaglutide produced approximately a 19.3% reduction in fat mass and 9.7% reduction in lean body mass over 68 weeks refers to the published exploratory body-composition analysis of that trial. Limitations: we did not purchase, receive or test any product; we commissioned no analysis; we located no certificate of analysis and therefore did not verify the third-party testing claims; we did not confirm the NSF facility certification with NSF or the facility registration with the FDA; and we did not assess label accuracy, taste, mixability or digestibility for any product. Katalys offer #1509 lists 2.00% default commission.
Affiliate Disclosure: This site may receive compensation from affiliate partners. This programme pays 2% of order value — the lowest rate among the merchants in this batch — which is roughly 48 cents on a $23.97 creatine tub and about 78 cents on a 4lb bag of pea protein. We earn considerably more from almost every other product we have reviewed recently, including several we advised readers against. This does not influence our editorial content or review ratings.